In todayโ€™s news of the weird: people want MORE Folgers? And theyโ€™re willing to sue over it?!

Now listen, before we move forward let me just make it abundantly clear that Iโ€™m not one to poo poo a personโ€™s coffee proclivities (in most cases). You want a dark roast? I dig. You favor pre-ground? I feel you. Maybe you just want instant. I understand.

With that said, letโ€™s proceed.

As reported by Ad Age, a Chicago area woman has filed a lawsuit against Folgers, alleging the iconic brand’s canisters donโ€™t contain enough coffee to make the 240 six-ounce cups stated on the packaging. According to the lawsuit, if consumers knew they werenโ€™t getting the 240 cups, they would have paid less for the coffee that currently costs [checks notes] $6.95 for 30.5 ounces, or not purchased the coffee at all.

Per the suit:

advert but first coffee cookbook now available

 

Indeed, it is a classic and unlawful bait-and-switch scheme that causes unsuspecting consumers to spend more money for less than the advertised amount of coffee they believe they are purchasing.

Doing some quick math here, for a 30.5-ounce canisterโ€”any canister, regardless of roast or blend, they all state a coffee serving size of โ€œone tablespoonโ€โ€”to make 240 six-ounce cups as advertised, a serving clocks in at 3.602g of coffee.

Now, for any coffee from a 24.2oz canister, the coffee serving size comprising a tablespoon is 3.266g. 11.3oz cans have a serving sizeโ€”yet again listed as one tablespoonโ€”of 3.559g. For those at home wondering what these numbers add up to in terms of brew ratio, between 47:1 and 52:1, just a touch higher the and 15:1 to 17:1 ratio suggested by the SCA.

So the million-dollar question isโ€”or excess of $5 million American dollar question, the amount the suit is seeking, roughly equivalent 21.9 million ounces of Folgersโ€”does 3.266-3.602g of coffee fill one tablespoon? I fresh ground some whole bean coffee I had on hand for this purely unscientific and not remotely admissible in court test of the hypothesis, and, well, you be the judge.

Folgers Scoop

Moserโ€™s suit goes on to allege recurring harm by Folgers because โ€œshe would like to continue purchasing Folgers ground coffee products, because she likes the taste.” Filed in Chicago federal court on November 30th, the suit seeks class-action status, joining โ€œmultiple cases filed throughout the country this year that make similar accusations against Folgers and other coffee companies,โ€ per Ad Age.

While I firmly stand behind anyone fastidiously pinching pennies, testing with great rigor the tensile strength of a dollar, it is the editorial position of this publication that in no way, shape, or form should a person be able to purchase nearly two pounds of coffee for under $7. This is an immorally low price built upon the labor of farmers who donโ€™t make enough to cover the costs of production.

It’s unlikely Ellen Moser or any other litigant knows any of this; they are just trying to get what they paid for.

Zac Cadwaladerย is the managing editor at Sprudge Media Network and a staff writer based in Dallas.ย Read more Zac Cadwaladerย on Sprudge.

New Rules of Coffee banner advertising an illustrated guide to the essential rules for enjoying coffee